tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-219871842008-07-02T03:48:51.588+02:00NEWSStaff Writerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01595895436414092599noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21987184.post-91224202081887904692007-09-24T00:31:00.000+02:002007-09-24T00:44:03.951+02:00EUROPE: European Union moves to Limit Power of Big Utility Companies [VIDEO]<img style="cursor: pointer; width: 190px; height: 140px;" class="glossy iradius25" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvbLXOsPbrI/AAAAAAAAFLg/_jMyEEhV3FY/s400/energy_reform.jpg" alt="The European Commission has adopted draft legislation that would separate power generation from distribution networks. The aim is to restrict the influence of big utility companies. But not everyone is happy. The idea behind the proposals is to keep large energy providers from exclusive control over the supply of natural gas and electricity to the European bloc. In part, the initiative is aimed at Russia, which provides around a quarter of Europe's gas, since the proposals would ban foreign firms from owning transmission networks -- unless agreements are reached between the European Union and the companies' home countries. But the proposals would also force utility companies within the Europea Union -- for instance, Germany's E.on or Electricite de France -- to sell off distribution networks or hand over control to an independent operator. And that has drawn mixed reactions. Necessary reforms? The Commission justified the proposals by saying they would boost competition and allow new operators to enter the market. The president of Germany's Association of Energy Consumers, Aribert Peters, welcomed the initiative, saying in a radio interview that it was the only way to lower prices and to ensure a level playing field. But both Germany and France would like to see their big utility companies retain more influence and are likely to try to negotiate compromises in the proposed legislation. The energy spokesman for Germany's governing Christian Democratic Union, Joachim Pfeiffer, said in a radio interview that uncoupling providers from distributors was " id="The European Commission has adopted draft legislation that would separate power generation from distribution networks. The aim is to restrict the influence of big utility companies. But not everyone is happy. The idea behind the proposals is to keep large energy providers from exclusive control over the supply of natural gas and electricity to the European bloc. In part, the initiative is aimed at Russia, which provides around a quarter of Europe's gas, since the proposals would ban foreign firms from owning transmission networks -- unless agreements are reached between the European Union and the companies' home countries. But the proposals would also force utility companies within the Europea Union -- for instance, Germany's E.on or Electricite de France -- to sell off distribution networks or hand over control to an independent operator. And that has drawn mixed reactions. Necessary reforms? The Commission justified the proposals by saying they would boost competition and allow new operators to enter the market. The president of Germany's Association of Energy Consumers, Aribert Peters, welcomed the initiative, saying in a radio interview that it was the only way to lower prices and to ensure a level playing field. But both Germany and France would like to see their big utility companies retain more influence and are likely to try to negotiate compromises in the proposed legislation. The energy spokesman for Germany's governing Christian Democratic Union, Joachim Pfeiffer, said in a radio interview that uncoupling providers from distributors was " completely="" wrong="" path="" and="" that="" previous="" liberalizing="" reforms="" should="" be="" given="" a="" chance="" to="" take="" border="0" /><br /><br /><h4 style="text-align: justify; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);font-family:arial;" class="detailContentTeasertext"><span style="font-size:130%;"> The European Commission has adopted draft legislation that would separate power generation from distribution networks. The aim is to restrict the influence of big utility companies. But not everyone is happy.</span></h4><div face="arial" style="text-align: justify; font-family: arial;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify; font-family: arial;"> </p><div style="text-align: justify;font-family:arial;"><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" >The idea behind the proposals is to keep large energy providers from exclusive control over the supply of natural gas and electricity to the European bloc.<br /><br />In part, the initiative is aimed at <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 204, 0);">Russia</span>, which provides around a quarter of Europe's gas, since the proposals would ban foreign firms from owning transmission networks -- unless agreements are reached between the European Union and the companies' home countries.<br /><br />But the proposals would also force utility companies within the Europea Union -- for instance, Germany's<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"> E.on</span> or<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 204, 0);"> Electricite de France</span> -- to sell off distribution networks or hand over control to an independent operator. And that has drawn mixed reactions.<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 51);font-size:180%;" ><strong>Necessary reforms?</strong></span><br /><strong></strong>The Commission justified the proposals by saying they would boost competition and allow new operators to enter the market.<br /><br />The president of Germany's <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 204, 204);">Association of Energy Consumers</span>, Aribert Peters, welcomed the initiative, saying in a radio interview that it was the only way to lower prices and to ensure a level playing field.<br /><br />But both <span style="font-weight: bold;">Germany</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">France</span> would like to see their big utility companies retain more influence and are likely to try to negotiate compromises in the proposed legislation.<br /><br />The energy spokesman for Germany's governing <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 204, 0);">Christian Democratic Union</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Joachim Pfeiffer</span>, said in a radio interview that uncoupling providers from distributors was "<span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0); font-weight: bold;">a completely wrong path</span>" and that previous liberalizing reforms should be given a chance to take effect.</span><br /></div><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /><a href="http://www.dw-world.de/"><br /></a></span><center><object height="350" width="425"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qA7EBdPbPIA"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qA7EBdPbPIA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="350" width="425"></embed> </object></center><br /><div style="text-align: center;font-family:arial;"><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;font-size:78%;" ><a href="http://www.dw-world.de/">Via|</a> DW News</span><span style="font-size:78%;"><br /></span><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.blogalaxia.com/tags/EUROPE" rel="tag">EUROPA</a>|</span><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.blogalaxia.com/tags/proteccionismo" rel="tag">proteccionismo</a>|<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Christian+Democratic+Union" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Christian+Democratic+Union?user=g3nergy'">Christian Democratic Union</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV?user=g3nergy'">BAJAENERGY TV</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/EDF" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/EDF?user=g3nergy'">EDF</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/EON" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/EON?user=g3nergy'">EON</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/European+Union" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/European+Union?user=g3nergy'">European Union</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/France" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/France?user=g3nergy'">France</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Germany" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Germany?user=g3nergy'">Germany</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/protectionist+policy" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/protectionist+policy?user=g3nergy'">protectionist policy</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Russia" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Russia?user=g3nergy'">Russia</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog?user=g3nergy'">energyblog</a><br /></span></div><span style="font-size:78%;"><br /></span><span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);font-size:180%;" >Found this post useful? Consider subscribing to </span><span style="font-size:180%;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;font-family:arial;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" ><span style="font-size:180%;"><a set="yes" linkindex="94" style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga" target="_blank" rel="tag">The Energy Data Warehouse Feed/RSS</a></span><br /></span><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvCqdYGSf7I/AAAAAAAAFEc/DHLi67sdFtU/s200/feed_energyblog.jpg" alt="Feed from The EnergyBlog" id="Feed from The EnergyBlog" border="0" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >Thanks a lot To my reliable visitors !</span><br /></p></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga?i={$entrydata.url|escape:url}" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Staff Writerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01595895436414092599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21987184.post-41328903183624978522007-09-21T02:27:00.000+02:002007-09-21T03:38:46.888+02:00eNergy STOCKS: Oil Prices and the $83 to another record [VIDEO]<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);font-family:arial;" >Threat shuts 28% of Gulf oil output; natural-gas futures fall to one-week low |</span> <div style="text-align: justify;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><b>Energy shares rose Thursday as a storm threat in the Gulf of Mexico and record oil prices stoked buying. </b></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;font-family:arial;" class="StoryBottom"> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />The <span style="font-style: italic;">Amex Oil Index</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">XOI</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="XOI"><span class="up">1,460.56</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="XOI"><span class="up">+6.14</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="XOI"><span class="up">+0.4%</span></span>) </span> rose 0.5%, as oil advanced as much as $1.07 to $83.20, another intraday record.</span></div><div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Valero</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">VLO</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="VLO"><span class="up">70.09</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="VLO"><span class="up">+0.52</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="VLO"><span class="up">+0.7%</span></span>) </span> rose 1% to $70.32. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Exxon Mobil</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">XOM</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="XOM"><span class="up">92.09</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="XOM"><span class="down">-0.03</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="XOM"><span class="down">0.0%</span></span>) </span> rose 25 cents to $92.37. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />The<span style="font-style: italic;"> Amex Natural Gas Index</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">XNG</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="XNG"><span class="up">517.94</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="XNG"><span class="down">-0.99</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="XNG"><span class="down">-0.2%</span></span>) </span> traded little-changed at 518, after natural-gas inventories rose by 63 billion cubic feet for the week ended Sept. 14, the Energy Department said Thursday. Analysts expected a climb of 79 billion. Total natural gas stocks now stand at 3.132 trillion cubic feet, down 32 billion cubic feet from the year-ago level, but 238 billion cubic feet above the five-year average, the government data said. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />The <span style="font-style: italic;">Philadelphia Oil Service Index</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">$OSX</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="qted symbol"></span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up">296.68</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up">+3.58</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up">+1.2%</span></span>) </span> rose 0.9%. Overall, the energy sector fared better than the overall market, dragged down by a profit warning from FedEx <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">FDX</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="qted symbol"></span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="FDX"><span class="up"> 104.45</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="FDX"><span class="down">-3.06</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="FDX"><span class="down">-2.8%</span></span>) </span> and other economic jitters. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />Approximately 27.7% of the oil production in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gulf of Mexico</span> has been shut-in, roughly 360,169 barrels of oil a day, the <span style="font-style: italic;">Minerals Management Service</span> said in an afternoon update. It is also estimated that approximately 16.7% of the natural gas production in the gulf has been shut-in, roughly 1,288 million cubic feet of gas per day. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />Personnel have been evacuated from a total of five production platforms in the face of foul weather in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gulf of Mexico</span>, equivalent to 0.6% of the 834 manned platforms in the gulf. <span style="font-weight: bold;">BP</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">BP</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="BP"><span class="up"> 71.05</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="BP"><span class="up">+0.52</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="BP"><span class="up">+0.7%</span></span>) </span> said Thursday it's begun shutting down some energy production on platforms in the <span style="color: rgb(0, 204, 204); font-weight: bold;">Gulf of Mexico</span> in the face of a storm system off the coast of Florida. The </span><span style="color: rgb(255, 204, 0);font-size:130%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">oil giant</span></span><span style="font-size:130%;"> has evacuated non-essential personnel and it's beginning to move production personnel back to shore. BP did not provide any specific figures on production cuts or the number of people affected. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />Other oil and gas producers took similar actions. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cameron International</span> Corp. <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">CAM</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="CAM"><span class="up">92.74</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="CAM"><span class="up">+0.49</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="CAM"><span class="up">+0.5%</span></span>) </span> fell 77 cents to $91.48 after Capital One Southcoast Inc. maintained its buy rating on the stock. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fmc Technologies </span><span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">FTI</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="FTI"><span class="up">55.60</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="FTI"><span class="up">+0.15</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="FTI"><span class="up">+0.3%</span></span>) </span> rose 5 cents to $55.50 after <span style="font-weight: bold;">Capital One Southcoast</span> Inc. cut its rating on the stock to hold from buy. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rowan Companies</span> Inc. <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="font-weight: bold;">RDC</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="RDC"><span class="up">37.39</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="RDC"><span class="down">-0.23</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="RDC"><span class="down">-0.6%</span></span>) </span> fell 8 cents to $37.54 after it released its monthly fleet status, which met <span style="font-weight: bold;">Capital One Southcoast</span> Inc.'s target.<br /><br /> </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Early Thursday, the<span style="font-style: italic;"> National Hurricane Center</span> said weather patterns suggest a subtropical or a tropical cyclone to form as a storm system moves west into the eastern <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gulf of Mexico</span>. Heavy rainfall is possible over portions of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Southeastern</span> U.s. during the next day or two.</span></div></div><div style="text-align: justify;font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);font-size:180%;" >Crude futures rally past $83 to another record</span></span><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><b>Crude-oil futures closed above $83 a barrel Thursday, sending the expiring benchmark contract further into uncharted territory on news that oil facilities in the Gulf of Mexico shut down 28% of production ahead of what's expected to become the tenth named storm of the Atlantic hurricane season.</b></span><br /><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;font-family:arial;" class="StoryBottom"> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Crude oil for October delivery briefly climbed as high as $84.10 a barrel in electronic trading, a level never before seen by a front-month contract. It closed up $1.39, or 1.7%, at $83.32 after reaching $83.90 during the regular trading session on the <span style="font-style: italic;">New York Mercantile Exchange</span> he expiration of the October crude contracts at the end of the day's session likely added to the market volatility. November became the lead-month contract at the close. That contract closed up 93 cents at $81.78.<br /><br /></span> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Two forces really hit the market into the close: the potential storm and the futures contract expiration, said Phil Flynn, a senior analyst at Alaron Trading.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> An area of low pressure has entered the Gulf of Mexico and could become a tropical depression in the next 12 to 24 hours, Accuweather.com reported Thursday afternoon. The system could become Tropical Storm Jerry on Friday, it said.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> The system is expected to move toward Texas or Louisiana over the weekend, threatening gas and oil fields as well as refineries in the northwest Gulf and nearby coastal areas, it said.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "Traders are taking this very seriously," said Flynn. They "learned a lesson from Hurricane Humberto that these things can develop quickly. Producers in the Gulf aren't taking any chances and shutting down production." </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Oil and gas operations in the Gulf have started to evacuate platforms and rigs in the path of what's currently called Tropical Area of Investigation 93 L, according to the U.S. Minerals Management Service.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> MMS estimates that about 27.5% of oil production in the Gulf has been shut in, or roughly 360,169 barrels of oil per day. It points out that estimate oil output from the Gulf as of April 2007 was 1.3 million barrels of oil per day. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />Also, about 16.7% of natural-gas production in the Gulf has been shut-in, MMS said. </span></div> <div class="h3"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" >Extended rally</span></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Still, after hitting consecutive highs, oil prices may be a bit tired. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "There is no doubt that after setting six-consecutive records, crude prices are severely overbought and due for a pullback," said <span style="font-weight: bold;">Edward Meir</span>, analyst at MF Global, in a research note.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "However, yesterday did not seem to be the time for such a decline, as the combination of constructive <span style="color: rgb(255, 153, 255);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">Energy Information Administration</span></span> numbers, weather concerns, and a continuation of the 'relief rally' engineered by the Fed on Tuesday, all combined to keep the crude complex well bid," Meir said.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Recent storm activity has contributed to declines in U.S. refinery activity. Refinery utilization fell to 89.6% of capacity for the week ended Sept. 14, from 90.5% a week earlier, the Energy Department reported Wednesday. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> At the same time, crude supplies fell by 3.8 million barrels, motor gasoline inventories climbed by 400,000 barrels and distillate supplies rose by 1.5 million last week, the report said.<br /><br /><span class="lk001"></span></span> </div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> On Thursday, October reformulated gasoline closed at $2.1351 a gallon, up 4.17 cents, or 2%. October heating oil closed up 1.56 cents at $2.2609 a gallon. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />"As long as inventories of crude keep dropping, I think we can expect the price to keep rising," said <span style="font-weight: bold;">Charles Perry</span>, chairman of energy-consulting firm Perry Management. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br />But he said the <span style="font-style: italic;">Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries</span> is concerned about the price climb. The group of key oil producers would "really like to se the price fall, and [that] may cause them to increase production," said Perry. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> <br />"What </span><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries</span></span><span style="font-size:130%;"> fears is conservation and alternate fuels, both of which are encouraged by higher prices," he said. </span></div><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span><div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Crude "supply is still above the five-year average yet because of the talk of global tight supply in the fourth quarter, for now the crude market seems less than impressed," said Alaron's Flynn.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "Still my long-term yearly technical target is within reach, and the fact that supplies are above the five-year average might soon produce a little relief that makes the risks to the consumer defiantly on the upside," he said. </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> In other energy-related news, the <span style="font-style: italic;">New York Mercantile Exchange</span> Inc. <span class="LqQtGroup"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);" class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001">NMX</span>:</span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="NMX"><span class="up"> 123.30</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="NMX"><span class="down">-0.05</span></span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="NMX"><span class="down">0.0%</span></span>) </span> said Thursday that it set a daily volume record for crude oil futures on the CME Globex electronic trading platform on Wednesday. Crude-oil futures hit a record 626,447 contracts, exceeding the 616,688 contracts traded on Sept. 6. </span></div> <div class="h3"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" >Natural-gas futures drop</span></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;">Also on <span style="font-weight: bold;">Nymex</span>, natural-gas futures prices fell to their lowest level in more than a week after the Energy Department reported early Thursday that supplies of the commodity in storage rose 63 billion cubic feet for the week ended Sept. 14.<span style="font-weight: bold;"> MF Global</span> had said market expectations call for a rise of 58 billion cubic feet to 78 billion cubic feet.<br /><br />Analysts at <span style="font-style: italic;">Strategic Energy & Economic Research</span> expected to see a climb of 71 billion cubic feet. Overall supplies were still at the upper end of the five-year average and there's still a month and a half left in the supply injection season, said Beth Sewell, a managing partner at <span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">Quantum Gas & Power Services</span></span>. Total stocks now stand at 3.132 trillion cubic feet, down 32 billion cubic feet from the year-ago level, but 238 billion cubic feet above the five-year average, the government data said.<br /><br /></span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Natural gas for October delivery fell 17.2 cents, or 2.8%, to close at $6.008 per million British thermal units. It fell as low as $5.955 earlier. Still, the market is a bit "mixed because of the potential storm that's over Florida right now," said Sewell.<br /><br /> </span></div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> In Thursday's trading in energy equities, oil and gas stocks mainly higher, with the <span style="font-style: italic;">Philadelphia Oil Service Index</span> <span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="quotedToolTip"> (<span class="lk001" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;">$OSX</span><span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;">:</span></span><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px; color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up"> 296.68</span></span></span><span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Change" mwformat="+2" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up">+3.58</span></span><span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;">, </span><span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;" class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="PercentChange" mwformat="+1%" mwsymbol="$OSX"><span class="up">+1.2%</span></span>) </span> marking the largest gains.<br /><br /><span class="lk001"></span></span> </div> <div class="p"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Elsewhere on the commodity markets, gold futures rallied, as the dollar hit a new all-time low against the euro. Taking a broad measure of the commodities markets, the <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index</span><span class="LqQtGroup"><span class="price" style="padding-left: 3px;"><span class="mwlivequotes" mwfield="Price" mwformat=",2" mwsymbol="26099104"><span class="up"> </span></span></span> </span> was up 1% at 177.60 points.<br /><br /><br /></span></div></div></div><br /><center><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ddX2jSq3OJc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="360" width="450"></embed> </center><br /><br /><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><br /><span style="font-size:78%;">Via| MarketWatch |by Steve Gelsi | by </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:78%;" >Myra P. Saefong & Polya Lesova</span><br /><div style="text-align: left;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.blogalaxia.com/tags/cotizaciones" rel="tag">cotizaciones</a>|</span><span style="font-size:78%;"><span class="tags"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Cameron+International" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Cameron+International?user=g3nergy'">Cameron International</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/OPEC" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/OPEC?user=g3nergy'">OPEC</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/energy+stocks" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/energy+stocks?user=g3nergy'">energy stocks</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV?user=g3nergy'">BAJAENERGY TV</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NYMEX" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/NYMEX?user=g3nergy'">NYMEX</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Capital+One+Southcoast" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Capital+One+Southcoast?user=g3nergy'">Capital One Southcoast</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rowan+Cos." rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Rowan+Cos.?user=g3nergy'">Rowan Cos.</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Capital+One+Southcoast" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Capital+One+Southcoast?user=g3nergy'">Capital One Southcoast</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Fmc+Technologies" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Fmc+Technologies?user=g3nergy'">Fmc Technologies</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Valero+Energy" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Valero+Energy?user=g3nergy'">Valero Energy</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ExxonMobil" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/ExxonMobil?user=g3nergy'">ExxonMobil</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BP" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/BP?user=g3nergy'">BP</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Gulf+of+Mexico" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Gulf+of+Mexico?user=g3nergy'">Gulf of Mexico</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/FedEx" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/FedEx?user=g3nergy'">FedEx</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog?user=g3nergy'">energyblog</a><br /><br /><br /><br /></span></span></div><div style="text-align: center;font-family:arial;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);font-size:130%;" >Found this post useful? Consider subscribing to </span><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;font-family:arial;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" ><span style="font-size:180%;"><a set="yes" linkindex="94" style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga" target="_blank" rel="tag">The Energy Data Warehouse Feed/RSS</a></span><br /></span><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvCqdYGSf7I/AAAAAAAAFEc/DHLi67sdFtU/s200/feed_energyblog.jpg" alt="Feed from The EnergyBlog" id="Feed from The EnergyBlog" border="0" /></a></span></p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 204, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >Thanks a lot To my reliable visitors !</span><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span></p></div><div class="tag_list" style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span class="tags"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/energyblog?user=g3nergy'"></a></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga?i={$entrydata.url|escape:url}" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Staff Writerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01595895436414092599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21987184.post-20667215100897014132007-09-20T09:33:00.000+02:002007-09-20T14:56:07.328+02:00EUROASIA: Europeans Versus The Rest Of The World [VIDEO]<img style="width: 190px; height: 317px;" class="glossy iradius25" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvIooYGSgFI/AAAAAAAAFF8/79THDzGHz1c/s400/_gazprom_russia_energyblog.jpg" alt=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." id=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." border="0" /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 51, 204);"><br /><span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);">Europe Drops Energy Curtain | ¿What´s going on with the europeans and is </span></span><span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);" class="item-title"></span><a set="yes" linkindex="263" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga/%7E3/158836248/european-union-proposals-on-table-and.html"><span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);">The proposals on table and building the future for Super European Energy Majors ?</span></a><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 51, 204);"><span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);">| Gazprom Told to Split | </span></span><br /><a set="yes" linkindex="263" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/baja-EnergyBlog-laveaga/%7E3/158836248/european-union-proposals-on-table-and.html"></a><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong>The </strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong>’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the <span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span>. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform <a linkindex="25" href="http://www.unitedenergysystems.com/" target="_blank" class="textlinks">United Energy Systems</a> of Russia (UES), would close the door on <a linkindex="26" href="http://www.gazprom.ru/" target="_blank" class="textlinks">Gazprom</a> buying energy networks in the </strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong> until Russia and the </strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong> sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia.<br /><br /></strong></span></span><span class="news_main"> Three </span></span><span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">European</span> <span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">Commissioners</span></span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main">, Commission President <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jose Manuel Barroso</span>, </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> Energy Commissar <span style="font-style: italic;">Andris Piebalgs</span>, presented the project to reform the energy market of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Europe</span>, initiated in accordance with a </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> ruling in June. <span class="textlinks" style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Vladimir Putin</span>, during a visit to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Australia</span>, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Council of the European</span> Union’s 27 energy ministers and the <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="textlinks">European Parliament</span>, would block <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="textlinks">Gazprom</span> from investing in European energy.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kroes</span> began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives <span style="font-weight: bold;">2003/54/ec </span>and <span style="font-weight: bold;">2003/55/ec</span> concerning <span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 204);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">EC-wide antimonopoly</span></span> rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators</span> (<span style="font-weight: bold;">ACER</span>).</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> The idea behind <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kroes’</span> package is to create <span style="font-weight: bold;">ACER</span>, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in <span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(153, 153, 0);">UES</span></span>.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> The amendments to <span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 204, 204);">2003/54/ec</span></span> and <span style="color: rgb(51, 204, 255);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">2003/55/ec</span></span> forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 102, 0);">Gaz de France</span>, <a style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);" set="yes" linkindex="30" href="http://www.edf.fr/" target="_blank" class="textlinks">Electricite de France</a><span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);">, </span><a style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);" linkindex="31" href="http://www.eon.com/" target="_blank" class="textlinks">E.ON</a><span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);">, RWE, Endesa</span>) into generation and distribution companies. The </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Federal Grid Company</span>, as did <span style="font-weight: bold;">UES</span>. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Barroso</span> explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> said. In order to receive the sanction of <span style="font-weight: bold;">ACER</span> and the <span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span> to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gazprom</span> many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case <span style="font-weight: bold;">United Supply System</span> will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> The </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main">’s initiative shocked <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gazprom</span>. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Sergei Kupriyanov</span>, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “<span style="font-style: italic;">We share the main goal of the </span></span></span><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the </span></span><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="font-style: italic;">. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.</span>” The company said it has begun a “<span style="font-style: italic;">detailed analysis</span>” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main">. The government has also begun a careful study of the document.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /></span><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 231px; height: 156px;" class="glossy iradius25" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvIpBYGSgHI/AAAAAAAAFGM/zFb5FPlkabA/s320/+Alexander+Medvedev_energyblog.jpg" alt=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." id=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." border="0" /><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> Spokesman for the <span style="font-style: italic;">Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia</span> <span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Vasily Osmakov</span></span> said that “<span style="font-style: italic;">we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector</span>,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union Market</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> would serve this purpose. The head of <span style="font-weight: bold;">RSPP</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Alexander Shaahin</span>, said the regulations were non-constructive.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> Formally, the structures created in the division of <span style="font-weight: bold;">UES</span> meet the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> rules. “<span style="font-style: italic;">We are not planning to buy anything in the </span></span></span><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="font-style: italic;">, and therefore are not commenting on the document</span>,” Intera announced. Inter <span style="font-weight: bold;">UES</span> is taking a wait-and-see position. “<span style="font-style: italic;">The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,</span>” <span style="font-weight: bold;">Boris Zverev</span>, council to the head of the company said.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main">. Barroso explained that in the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main">’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the </span></span><span style="color: rgb(255, 153, 0);font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> will have access to European consumers.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /></span><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 216px; height: 223px;" class="glossy iradius25" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_m50azKGBdwU/RvIo3IGSgGI/AAAAAAAAFGE/2bGdI23QB0Y/s320/+neelie_kroes.jpg" alt=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." id=" Gazprom Told to Split | Europe Drops Energy Curtain | The European Commission’s proposed energy reforms seemed shockingly strict toward investors outside of the European Union. The energy reform suggested by Europe and the reform United Energy Systems of Russia (UES), would close the door on Gazprom buying energy networks in the European Union until Russia and the European Union sign a cooperation agreement and Gazprom is divided into production and transportation components. The project was presented yesterday by the European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes and must still be ratified by the countries of Europe. The reforms’ primary concern is Europe, not Russia. Three European Commissioners, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes and European Union Energy Commissar Andris Piebalgs, presented the project to reform the energy market of Europe, initiated in accordance with a European Commission ruling in June. Vladimir Putin, during a visit to Australia, expressed suspicion that the project would include protectionist measures against investment by Russian companies. His suspicions were overwhelmingly justified. The document, if ratified by the Council of the European Union’s 27 energy ministers and the European Parliament, would block Gazprom from investing in European energy. Kroes began work on the current reform package in June 2007 after the Council of the European Union rejected a previous version. Yesterday Kroes presented the reform package, which is made up of five documents. Two suggest amendments to directives 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec concerning EC-wide antimonopoly rules on the electric power and gas market. Another two amend the rules of transborder networks and gaslines (1228/2003 and 1775/2005), while the last would create an Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators (ACER). The idea behind Kroes’ package is to create ACER, a supranational organ with powers to set a single tariff, as well as regulatory and competition policies for the national regulators of European Commission members, thus managing the flow of energy in Europe. The same principle served as the basis for reforms in UES. The amendments to 2003/54/ec and 2003/55/ec forbid one company to simultaneously manage the production and transport of electric power or gas. The amendment would split regional energy companies (Gaz de France, Electricite de France, E.ON, RWE, Endesa) into generation and distribution companies. The European Commission does not intend to unite the distribution companies into an analogue of the Federal Grid Company, as did UES. Investment in electric power generation and gas production is not limited. The package does, however, put forth limitations on buying controlling stakes in the grid and pipeline companies; these limitations are extended to third-party nations as well. Barroso explained that division leads to a decrease in size. The energy reform will make them the “pinky” for mergers by companies from third-party countries. “We’re open, but we must not be naïve,” the head of the European Commission said. In order to receive the sanction of ACER and the European Commission to buy shares, companies from third-party countries must operate by the same principles in their home country. Gazprom many lay claim to Britain’s Centrica, in which case United Supply System will be removed and handed over to be managed by an independent company or sold. Discussion of the amendments will begin in early October 2007. If the amendments make it through the bureaucracy they could begin to affect investors beginning in May 2008. The European Commission’s initiative shocked Gazprom. The company declined to criticize the proposals, although earlier it commented on them negatively. Sergei Kupriyanov, press-secretary for Gazprom, announced yesterday that “We share the main goal of the European Union – to provide longer-term, reliable gas supplies to the European Union. Gazprom plans to bring constructive input into the discussion about energy regulation in Europe and is confident that its voice will be heard.” The company said it has begun a “detailed analysis” of the proposal’s text (about 200 pages) and is consulting with the European Union. The government has also begun a careful study of the document. Spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia Vasily Osmakov said that “we welcome any initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the energy sector,” but demurred that adding new administrative barriers on the European Union Market would serve this purpose. The head of RSPP, Alexander Shaahin, said the regulations were non-constructive. Formally, the structures created in the division of UES meet the European Union rules. “We are not planning to buy anything in the European Union, and therefore are not commenting on the document,” Intera announced. Inter UES is taking a wait-and-see position. “The project of reforming the European energy sector is too serious to comment on it extemporaneously. We should wait to see how things pan out, wait for the final iteration,” Boris Zverev, council to the head of the company said. The documents don’t directly explain how companies will be certified by the European Commission. Barroso explained that in the European Commission’s plan only entities whose home countries have the appropriate agreement with the European Commission will have access to European consumers. The “Kroes-Piebalgs amendments” are more serious for Russia than the passage of the Energy Charter, which doesn’t envision dividing Gazprom. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of Gazprom and the Ministry of Industry and Energy declare the topic closed. Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. The protectionist measures defending the European energy market will not likely be overturned, but the “Kroes-Piebalgs package” may not pass discussion in the European Union Council as happened in June. History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the WTO European Union Commissar for Trade Pascal Lamy made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup Gazprom’s monopoly on gas exports. May 21, 2004: Russia had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening Russia’s pipe system to all producers. March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (The Green Book), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the European Union suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the European Union border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies. Summer 2006: The European Commission worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. February 22, 2007: European Commission Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then “Gazprom will not be an exception.” June 16, 2007: European Union Competition Commissar Neelie Kroes announced that according to the new plan Gazprom will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction." border="0" /><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> The “<span style="font-weight: bold;">Kroes-Piebalgs amendments</span>” are more serious for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Russia</span> than the passage of the <span style="color: rgb(255, 204, 51);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">Energy Charter</span></span>, which doesn’t envision dividing <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gazprom</span>. However, the question was discussed within the Russian government from 1995-2003, when the management of <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);">Gazprom</span> and the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ministry of Industry and Energy</span> <span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);font-size:180%;" >declare the topic closed</span>.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> Gazprom can only hope for disagreement within the EU. Piebalgs admitted yesterday that within the EU there was not yet “full agreement” about how and for how long energy companies will be separated, but said that all 27 countries agree that it is something that needs to be done. <span style="color: rgb(51, 255, 255);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">The protectionist measures defending the European energy market</span></span> will not likely be overturned, but the “<span style="font-weight: bold;">Kroes-Piebalgs package</span>” may not pass discussion in the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union Council</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> as happened in June.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" ><span class="news_main"> History: What has Europe demanded from Gazprom</span></span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><span class="news_main">October 8, 2003: during negotiations about accession to the <a linkindex="32" href="http://www.wto.org/" target="_blank" class="textlinks">WTO</a> </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> Commissar for Trade <span style="font-weight: bold;">Pascal Lamy</span> made a “gas ultimatum” to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade containing six components: raise domestic gas prices, equalize domestic and foreign gas tariffs on gas transport, cancel or radically reduce export taxes on gas, provide oil and gas transportation freedom through Russian pipelines, allow for private pipeline construction and breakup <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gazprom</span>’s monopoly on gas exports. </span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> May 21, 2004: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Russia</span> had undertaken only two of the six components: raising domestic gas prices and opening <span style="font-weight: bold;">Russia</span>’s pipe system to all producers.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> March, 2006: The European Commission presented Europe’s new energy strategy (<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 255, 51);">The Green Paper</span>), which rejected long-term bilateral agreements on gas shipments. Instead, the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> suggested a single framework contract by which Gazprom would sell gas across the </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><strong><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0);">European Union</span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> border and its further delivery would be taken over by European companies.</span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> Summer 2006: The </span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span></span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:130%;" ><span class="news_main"> worked out a plan for obligatory split of energy entities into production and transportation companies. </span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> February 22, 2007: <span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);font-size:180%;" ><span style="font-weight: bold;">European Commission</span></span> Spokesman (….) emphasized that if these rules are adopted then <span style="font-weight: bold;">“Gazprom</span> will not be an exception.” </span><br /><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><span class="news_main"> June 16, 2007: <span style="font-weight: bold;">European Union</span> Competition Commissar <span style="font-weight: bold;">Neelie Kroes</span> announced that according to the new plan <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gazprom</span> will have to sell its stake in the Northern European gas pipeline that is under construction.</span></span><br /><span class="news_main"></span></div><span class="news_main"> </span><br /><br /><center><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=313093&server=vimeo.com&fullscreen=1&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=1&color=00ADEF" height="332" width="480"> <param name="quality" value="best"> <param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"> <param name="scale" value="showAll"> <param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=313093&server=vimeo.com&fullscreen=1&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=1&color=00ADEF"></object><br /></center><br /><br /><span style="font-size:78%;"><br /></span><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.kommersant.com/">Via|</a>Kommersant|by Dmitry Butrin</span><br /><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.blogalaxia.com/tags/proteccionismo" rel="tag">proteccionismo</a>|<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Agency+for+Cooperation+among+Energy+Regulators" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Agency+for+Cooperation+among+Energy+Regulators?user=g3nergy'">Agency for Cooperation among Energy Regulators</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Electricite+du+France" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Electricite+du+France?user=g3nergy'">Electricite du France</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Gaz+du+France" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Gaz+du+France?user=g3nergy'">Gaz du France</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/2003/55/ec" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/2003/55/ec?user=g3nergy'">2003/55/ec</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/2003/54/ec" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/2003/54/ec?user=g3nergy'">2003/54/ec</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Federal+Grid+Company" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Federal+Grid+Company?user=g3nergy'">Federal Grid Company</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/United+Supply+System" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/United+Supply+System?user=g3nergy'">United Supply System</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ministry+of+Industry+and+Energy+of+Russia" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Ministry+of+Industry+and+Energy+of+Russia?user=g3nergy'">Ministry of Industry and Energy of Russia</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kroes-Piebalgs+package" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Kroes-Piebalgs+package?user=g3nergy'">Kroes-Piebalgs package</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pascal+Lamy" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Pascal+Lamy?user=g3nergy'">Pascal Lamy</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/video" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/video?user=g3nergy'">video</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/European+Commission" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/European+Commission?user=g3nergy'">European Commission</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/BAJAENERGY+TV?user=g3nergy'">BAJAENERGY TV</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/monopoly" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/monopoly?user=g3nergy'">monopoly</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Vasily+Osmakov" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Vasily+Osmakov?user=g3nergy'">Vasily Osmakov</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/energy+market" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/energy+market?user=g3nergy'">energy market</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Alexander+Shaahin" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Alexander+Shaahin?user=g3nergy'">Alexander Shaahin</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Gazprom" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Gazprom?user=g3nergy'">Gazprom</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sergei+Kupriyanov" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Sergei+Kupriyanov?user=g3nergy'">Sergei Kupriyanov</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ACER" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/ACER?user=g3nergy'">ACER</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/GDF" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/GDF?user=g3nergy'">GDF</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/UES" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/UES?user=g3nergy'">UES</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/EON" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/EON?user=g3nergy'">EON</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/RWE" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/RWE?user=g3nergy'">RWE</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Endesa" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/Endesa?user=g3nergy'">Endesa</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/EDF" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/EDF?user=g3nergy'">EDF</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/protectionist+policy" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/protectionist+policy?user=g3nergy'">protectionist policy</a>,<a href